Does this sound familiar?
- Entscheidungen werden aufgeschoben, weil die Auswirkungen unklar sind.
- Gruppendenken dominiert — echte Gegenargumente fehlen im Prozess.
- Aus vergangenen Fehlentscheidungen wird nicht systematisch gelernt.
What it's about
Systematically improve the quality of strategic decisions. Not through more information, but through better decision processes. Proven frameworks and techniques — from Cynefin through Pre-Mortem to Decision Journals — applied hands-on and transferred to your context.
Who it's for
- Leaders and decision-makers who want to make better decisions under uncertainty
- Teams that want to professionalize their decision processes and resolve decision gridlock
- Organizations that want to build decision-making capability as a strategic competency
Content & Modules
01 Understanding Decisions
Recognizing cognitive biases and groupthink. Why good intentions do not lead to good decisions.
02 Applying Frameworks
Cynefin for context assessment. Pre-Mortem for risk evaluation. Consent vs. Consensus as decision procedures.
03 Designing Decision Processes
Clarifying roles and accountabilities. Defining escalation logic for different decision types.
04 Decision Journals
Document, track, and systematically learn from decisions. Establish a personal learning tool.
Outcome
- Categorize decision situations by complexity (Cynefin)
- Apply Pre-Mortem, Consent, and other techniques situationally
- Clearly structure decision processes in your own team
- Decision Journal established as a personal learning tool
Format
Duration 1 Day (4 modules of 90 minutes each)
Participants 6–12 participants
Setting In-house or remote
Note Each participant brings a real decision situation. Concrete transfer guaranteed.
Investment From 3,900 €